Click
here to find out how you can support the work of the Centre

extra!
p.s.
extra! comes to you alongside p.s., the fortnightly e-mail
and web discussion forum from the Centre for Contemporary Christianity
in Ireland.
Where
p.s. is published on the second and fourth Wednesdays of
the month, p.s. extra! arrives occasionally, in-between times,
to bring you further biblical reflection and theological thought
on contemporary matters of broad public concern.
To
comment, or read other comments on articles, please click
here to go to our discussion board.
To
find out more about p.s. and read previous editions, click
here.
|
On refugees...
|

|
|
Under current legislation those recognised
as Refugees in the UK (and that means those who have successfully
gone through the legal process of being granted asylum) are allowed
to stay here indefinitely. Of course, nothing prevents a refugee
from returning home should he or she wish to. Naturally, many long
to return to their country of origin when safe and appropriate.
Nevertheless, UK law provides the security of a permanent safe place.
But this could change at the end of August if Government proposals
go through.
Richard Solly from the Churches'
Commission on Racial Justice (CCRJ) explains, "The British
Government intends to stop granting indefinite leave to remain to
people who are recognized as refugees. They will instead give them
limited leave to remain for five years, after which they may be
forced to return to their country of origin. Their case will be
reviewed if the Government decides that their country of origin
is now safe, and if an adjudicator agrees leave to remain will be
revoked."
On the face of it this may not seem
unreasonable - life changes, situations change, regimes change.
It could be quite safe for them to return home and we'd have done
our bit. Is it really practical in this day and age to offer life-long
residency to all those granted asylum in the UK? Are these new proposals
not merely a pragmatic response to a changing world?
First, a few facts. Contrary to popular
opinion, the UK is not being flooded with refugees. At the end of
2003, Britain hosted around 290,000 refugees (source UNHCR 2004
Global Refugee Trends, June 2005), about 3.1% of the world's 9.7
million, and 0.5% of the British population. The UK is the world's
fourth largest economy, yet the world's poorest countries bear responsibility
for most refugees. The UN Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees
states that, "a satisfactory solution
cannot
be
achieved without international cooperation." We need to keep
doing our bit.
Similarly, Government figures from
2001 (the latest available) show that, despite the belief that people
come here to take from the system, migrants to the UK, including
asylum seekers and refugees, make a net fiscal contribution to the
economy of £2.5 billion. It is a myth that refugees are here
for a great life at "our" expense.
But aside from the benefits to our
economic, community and cultural life in the UK, what is the potential
cost of these proposals to such individuals? Many will have experienced
significant trauma and hardship in their country of origin and do
not have an "easy life" while being processed through
our asylum system. Asylum seekers are not allowed to work, only
receive state support set at 30% below normal income support, do
not jump housing queues, or, as some would have you believe, get
mobile phones or cars. They are no more likely to commit crimes
than anyone else, and are more likely to be victims of crime.
Being given refugee status affords
people a chance to begin to rebuild shattered lives. Why should
they be forced to start over five years down the line?
As Richard Solly points out, "This
will, of course, prevent people with refugee status from feeling
safe and able to integrate into British society until the five years
have passed and they have been granted indefinite leave to remain".
It leaves refugees in an uncertain position, which is totally inconsistent
with other Government policies to assist the integration of refugees
in the UK. There will inevitably be cases where families who have
committed everything to establish life here and to integrate will
be threatened with removal, with all the upheaval, not to mention
the bureaucracy this causes. More than this, it is a move that lacks
any evidence that problems have arisen from the current policy,
or that there is any benefit in granting temporary leave only.
Leviticus 19 commanded the Israelites
not to mistreat the alien. Instead, "the alien who resides
with you shall be to you as the citizen among you" (v33-34).
Indeed the remnants of the harvest reaping are to be left for the
poor and the alien (v9-10) though it would seem in our case the
harvest is made more bountiful by the alien. We may not be under
the Law, but as Christians we follow the same Law-giver, and are
called to show his priorities in our actions. In this part of the
great immigration debate, at least, should we not urge the government
to abandon this unnecessary change?
What can we do?
- Check out the facts: This
piece is based on communication received from the Churches'
Commission for Racial Justice, information from the Refugee
Council (which includes references to Police and Home Office
publications) and Early
Day Motion 569 on Refugee Status which is a statement signed
by MPs who wish to oppose this change in the law.
- Contact your MP: Having
read this "Early Day Motion" (explanation here),
you might like to contact you MP (if you live in the UK) through
the web or by letter
and ask her or him to support it.
* * *
The Centre's
latest resource, Power
and Providence: Studies on the Book of Esther is now available
online (click
here) or by contacting Anna Rankin.
We are pleased
to recommend "Christianity: the encounter with modern culture",
a six week course by Prof. David Livingstone and Prof. Stephen Williams
beginning in September at the Institute for Christian Training.
For further details go to http://www.union.ac.uk/ctnet/culture.html
|