|
INTERVIEW:
OIL AND WATER
Mariah Garvey
MARIA
GARVEY is the leader of LArche Belfast, an interdenominational
faith community and voluntary agency providing a service of support
to people with intellectual disabilities. The Belfast community
is based on the Ormeau Road in a house purchased in partnership
with the Oaklee Housing Association. There are 126 L'Arche communities
in 31 countries worldwide. Maria has been with L'Arche for 18
years and came to Belfast in 2000. She is originally from Cork.
What is
it like being a leader in a faith-based community operating in a
secular context as a service provider in the statutory sector?
Its not always easy, its a challenge and it keeps me
human right down into the soles of my feet!!
In our world,
leadership and management are frequently assumed to be synonymous,
and they certainly overlap very strongly where there is an involvement
of a statutory nature in an organisation, such as LArche.
I am very clear that a leader is somebody who leads people and a
manager is someone who manages processes. These can be quite different
roles, though they aren't mutually exclusive. However, in many cases,
the expectation from the statutory perspective is that a leader
is just a good manager.
On a daily
basis, I'm responsible for managing the processes required to ensure
that the care provided to people with disabilities in the community
is appropriate to their needs. At the same time, I have been called
by people here in Belfast and mandated by LArche International
to be the leader of a community that has its roots in faith and
in gospel values, and that role calls forth quite a different set
of gifts and skills.
Overall, I
am called to lead a community comprising a diverse membership of
people taking up various roles in relation to both the service provision
and the mission of LArche in Belfast these include
voluntary and paid assistants and administrative staff as well as
the people who have learning disabilities who are at the heart of
our community and are referred to as the Core Members.
Ultimately,
I believe it is our mission that leads us and that my role, as leader,
is to hold the community in front of the vision to which we are
publicly committed. Together, we are accountable for ensuring that
the way we live and the decisions we make are an authentic expression
of our worldview. However, in a strictly secular or service provision
context the criteria used to assess the value and meaning of our
lives and work together are based on the premise that care and support
can be measured, audited and has market value. However, not everything
in life can be accounted for in that way.
For example,
our commitment to a vision of interdependence and mutuality has
huge significance for how we live. We make decisions not just on
the basis of what is personally good for the individual but also
the wider impact of those decisions on us as human beings and on
the wider community. However, all the funding we receive, and therefore
all the criteria that measure the success of our work, are based
on a worldview of independence and individuality
and a way of being in the world that is focused on human rights,
often to the exclusion of human responsibilities.
The dilemma
for me is how to be the manager of an organisation that is adequately
transparent and accountable, in terms of the service we provide
and the funding we receive, and yet be the leader of a community
where welcoming difference, honouring vulnerability and fostering
interdependent relationships is at the heart of what we do.
What motivates
you as a leader?
What gives me energy is that I believe it is possible to create
a world where it is enough to be human. I believe that my life and
my relationships can be a reflection of a more human society and
that in choosing to share our lives together in a community we are
called to challenge what dehumanises people in the world today.
With the constantly
growing possibilities of technology, more is expected of people
all the time. It is less acceptable to make mistakes nowadays and
increasingly we are expected to be perfect, and to be everything
to everyone at all times. In this climate of achievement and success
there are still those who are dying of loneliness. An increasing
number of people are finding it hard to fit in, be
good enough or to keep up the pace more
and more people are finding themselves on the margins of society.
Sure, those who are in the social care system may well have their
care needs professionally and adequately met, but who has time to
stop and celebrate their existence, who chooses simply to be with
them instead of providing for them or doing to them? Who chooses
them as friends?
The longing
in me to be part of creating a world that is slow enough to welcome
the slowest and soft enough to welcome the most fragile is what
makes me get up every day.
So your
mission is much larger than providing for the care needs of a small
group of people?
Absolutely all of our lives have meaning beyond our attributed
identities, roles, and status. Often we touch and change one anothers
lives in ways that we can neither know nor imagine. People who have
learning disabilities are infinitely more than clients
and I presume that there isnt anyone who would want the meaning
or mission of their lives to be reduced or limited to the identities
of service users and providers. We have the responsibility
and the possibility to bring about a more human society and my big
question as a leader is how to foster a sense of citizenship in
the members of the community, a sense of belonging and power in
the world and a belief in something beyond what we see that can
set us free.
What is
your experience of being a female leader in a relatively conservative
society?
Being a woman is so fully part of who I am that I take it for granted.
So, to be honest, the words 'female' and 'leader' dont often
come together in the same thought for me. I suppose I am so focused
on my part in bringing about the world that I want to live in that
I have never wondered whether or not I would experience the world
differently if I were a man. I come from the Catholic tradition
where there are a lot of issues around gender in respect of the
hierarchy and men and women taking their place in the church. But
I have always assumed that I have the right and responsibility,
the authority and the possibility to take up a personal leadership
role, even if it is hasnt been given to me through the structures
of the church. As a member of the congregation, every time I turn
to the person next to me to acknowledge their presence and every
time I offer someone the sign of peace in church and really mean
it I take up my responsibility and my authority. I often say in
the community that every single one of us can be a leader
there isnt a blueprint. If you believe firmly enough
in the kind of world you want to live in, and live in it now, if
you stand in the world you stand for, then your life becomes your
way of leading and it doesn't matter whether you are a man or woman,
adult or child. I realise that I may sound naïve, so I do want
to acknowledge that in relation to leadership I know that gender
matters.
Have you
faced challenges as a woman within the sector? How male-dominated
is the sector?
Oh, very!
And yes I have been challenged. Education and the caring professions
are generally the reserve of women nowadays. Men are needed, in
terms of male role-modelling and in terms of providing appropriate
care, but very few enter the professions. When they do, they very
quickly climb the ranks. Its hard to accept but I suppose
I think, that while they might be authorised within the organisational
structures to be leaders it doesnt make them the only leaders.
I believe that you have as much power as a member of
an organisation as you have as a leader. If you are
committed to the vision and mission of that organisation, whatever
your role is, you are powerful. Good members call forth
good leaders and members committed to the wellbeing and vision of
the whole are often our hidden leaders and unsung heroes.
Maybe my rationale
is a way of avoiding the gender/power issues but I prefer to believe
that its my way of not getting seduced into rivalries that
only make me miserable and distract me from what I really want to
be doing with my life.
Do you think
in a way you actually subvert the issue by saying to yourself I
can lead from where I am?
Thats exactly it. It probably comes from many years of being
inspired by Martin Luther King Jr's and Gandhis lives and
vision of non-violence and from my deep sense that the way to live
is not to spend my life attacking what doesnt work or what
doesnt seem to bring about a slower, softer world. Instead,
I offer myself to what is possible and use the energy that I have
towards that.
What do
you identify as the key skills or attributes of a leader?
A leaders value system and worldview need to be absolutely
at one with the values and the worldview of the organisation that
they are leading.
When we say
together in LArche that, We are people with and without
learning disabilities sharing life in communities of faith. Mutual
relationships and trust in God are at the heart of our life together.
We seek to build a world that recognises the unique value of every
person and our need for one another, it is essential that
my life and my way of leading is a personal and authentic expression
of that.
At its heart,
I think that leadership is about personal integrity, authenticity
and an absolute clarity that what I am about in the world and what
the organisation seeks to be in the world are one and the same.
I could be
the most skilled leader in the world but if what I do is not the
same as what I say, it would mean nothing. In fact all the activities
of our community need to be an expression of this vision of a more
loving world so the same is true for the members of LArche.
Authenticity
is key once we get out of our beds in the morning, what we
do speaks much more loudly than our words. In that sense, being
a good leader and a good member are the same thing.
I also believe
that the wisdom is always in the group and that the leader is not
an expert. Therefore, for me, the key skills are listening,
facilitating and enabling the members of the community to take up
their voices, to be engaged with the mission and to be responsible,
in all of their actions, for our shared worldview.
Because we
are a faith community we often reflect on the vision of the
wounded healer and we seek to acknowledge and embrace our
vulnerability as a gift. Taking the risk to be vulnerable is one
of the greatest challenges to me as leader, especially when the
common expectation is that I will be strong, make decisions, and
be wise and that I will know the way forward at all times. I am
often none of those things and often I dont know much but
the phrase that has sustained and comforted me over the past year
is I dont know, but together we do. Acknowledging
that the wisdom is in the body implies that I am also willing to
wait for God to speak through it. That takes time and patience and
respect and a commitment to the inclusion of every voice. Its
not always easy but it is always good.
How do you
balance protecting the vulnerable and the need to build relationships
of trust?
The constant fear of bad things happening creates an atmosphere
of suspicion in our world. Often, nowadays, our statutory regulations
are based in fear and a desire to protect us from worst-case scenarios.
A default position is that the stranger is a danger and the person
providing care to those who are vulnerable is also a potential threat
to the safety of that person. We live in a litigious society and
that has huge implications for us as a community. To create relationships
that are interdependent and mutual requires that we foster and nurture
trust and that the decisions we make and the activities we engage
in are founded in love not fear. Of course, we are always conscious
of our duty of care to protect those at the heart of our community
who are vulnerable in terms of their innocence and their level of
need but when the need for protection outweighs the right of the
person to be treated as fully human then the balance is skewed.
If the only
role of a leader is to protect the most vulnerable from potential
abuse, then I am not being a leader I am a manager of fear in a
society that is afraid of itself. That is the thing that is most
difficult for me and the only way I can redress this imbalance is
to attend as much to the good news stories in our world as the bad.
There are many more stories of care founded on love, respect, dignity
and honour than there are of situations of violation and abuse.
Bad news breeds fear and fear dehumanises; good news, on the other
hand leads us to trust in the world again and ultimately creates
freedom and a belief in what is good.
No legislation,
regulation or insurance can protect the world from its shadow side,
but as leaders, when we believe in a God who is bigger than what
we know, a God who is able to bring a people out of slavery through
the Red Sea into freedom, then we can offer an alternative view
and we can call people to freedom from fear, and towards new possibilities.
When we have come to the end of our own resources there are always
resources beyond ours. That is the kind of faith that leaders need
to have. I think we often choose safety rather than
freedom. I believe that the world needs prophetic leaders more than
ever before, people who are free enough to see something other than
a reality limited by fear and suspicion.
What are
the needs of leaders today?
Leaders
need time and space. Because of the emphasis on management today
a lot of good leaders have become worldweary managers and spend
their time up to their eyeballs in paper and electronic files. There
is nothing like a paper mountain to block the view and dull
the vision. It takes time and stillness to be a good leader
and allow the Spirit of God, rather than the pressure of speed,
to be at work in us.
I frequently
loose my perspective and become overwhelmed with the demands of
continual communication. To stay free and fresh in my role I have
to make time to withdraw to a place apart where I can make a connection
with the deepest call in myself and that which originally called
me into LArche. I often imagine that that is what Jesus did
when he went into the wilderness to pray.
Leaders also
need good company. Leadership, by its nature, can sometimes be a
lonely road and can lead us into isolation. We need wise listeners
and peer groups for support and places to go where we are held accountable
to our values and our original call.
Every part
finds its meaning in the whole so, for leaders and for members,
having times to tell our stories and find our meaning in the bigger
picture is really important. It is a way of remembering why we came
here and why we choose to stay.
Do you think
leaders are born or are they made?
Probably both. St Paul talks about leadership as a gift and I believe
that leadership can be called forth in all of us to the extent of
our commitment to one another and to a vision beyond ourselves.
When we come together around a common purpose we become one body
with one spirit and many gifts, and in the offering and welcoming
of those gifts we are given and take up our personal leadership.
The needs in our world that move us to respond and that allow us
to offer our gifts also mould us and shape us into leaders. So I
reckon that leadership is what happens when the gifts within us
respond to the needs beyond us. In this respect I think that leadership
comes from within us and beyond us at the same time.
What would
you say your leadership style is?
I would use a metaphor and say that I am a dancer. I dance with
the community, sometimes taking the lead step, sometimes being led,
but what matters most is that we are all listening to the same music
as we dance together. Some people use words like visionary or charismatic
to describe my style but I try not to get too caught up in those
kinds of terms because they only offer a glimpse of a way of being
in one moment of time and are often subjective descriptions.
What are
the strengths and dangers of being a charismatic leader?
Through their gift of communication charismatic leaders often attract
people into the vision that inspires and sustains them and that
can be a real gift for enrolling people. But there is also a risk
in that. Sometimes people are so awed by the personal gifts and
charisma of the leader that they lose sight of the overall picture
and their sense of their own value, participation and contribution.
When that happens the initial enrolment doesnt give birth
to real engagement and leads to too much reliance on the leader.
I realise that
if I am truly to be Gods instrument, then I have to create
the community in such a way that if I died tomorrow morning it could
still go on. I dont want to create a community that depends
on me and I dont want to be leading a community into a vision
thats only mine.
What about
accountability, where do you get your authority from, who are you
accountable to, what is the role of the community?
It seems to me that the authority within the statutory area is very
closely linked to regulations, guidelines, measurability, completed
forms, bulging files and having all the boxes ticked, the 'i's dotted
and the 't's crossed.
The real authority
in a faith community in the Christian context, and mine as a leader,
comes through the Gospels, following Jesus and a faithful commitment
to serving our mission in the world. With that authority we can
reasonably hold all of our decisions and actions before the following
questions: Is this the most loving thing to do? Will this further
the possibility of a more human society? How can this lead us to
freedom from fear? Where are we being lead? What are the possibilities
that are manifested in us, and what is the world longing for through
us? Are we a response to what the world is calling for? These are
the questions that unify us, inspire us, motivate us, clarify our
roles and ultimately authorise us to act.
How do you
maintain the identity and integrity of the organisation as a faith
based community working as a statutory service provider?
I think
that its important for me to remind myself often that every
organisation including our own is no more or less than a group of
human beings doing the best they can, hoping that its enough.
Remembering this helps me to be forgiving and compassionate towards
myself and others and to keep things in perspective.
The world of
management is often one where relationships are contractual. Such
relationships are essentially conditional: if you do this, then
I will do that. In that context its understandable that a
person can easily be reduced to a human resource. As
a leader, however, my responsibility is to foster an environment
for human flourishing in a faith community that seeks to live relationships
inspired by the unconditional love of God. In that context we think
in terms of covenant relationships based on a promise of faithfulness
and a desire to welcome the other unconditionally as a person
just like me.
Contract and
covenant, management and leadership, service provision and community
living are all part of who we are and it is hard to keep them all
together. Sometimes its like trying to mix oil and water.
Its impossible at worst and messy at best. But that's life,
and the extent to which I can accept that messiness is also the
extent to which I can keep all the elements together in the whole.
In it all,
we hold ourselves accountable to the commandment of Christ: love
God and love your neighbour as yourself. Our motto is do
unto others as you would like it to be done unto you. This
is what keeps us human. When we accept that our humanity is our
only real identity then our integrity is always assured.
What are
the challenges of leading an interdenominational community in Northern
Ireland?
To be interdenominational in the fullest sense of that word, more
often than not, I need to take my lead from the Core Members of
the community. Those who are perceived as having learning disabilities
often have extraordinary teaching gifts and one such gift is a natural
capacity to welcome people just as they are. The human faculty of
judgement is closely linked to our intellectual capacity and it
is that very capacity of judgement that often makes it difficult
for us to welcome what is different to ourselves. In the global
north and west we make judgements largely in terms of dualities.
Here in Northern
Ireland, it is hard not to get sucked in to the Catholic/Protestant
duality because of the political and historical hotwiring into that
sort of thinking, but to create a cross-community or interdenominational
culture we have to let go of our either/or thinking and to adopt
a both/and mentality. This is hard to do, but I'm lucky to share
life with our Core Members who show us what welcome is really about
and who, in a very natural way, create around themselves communities
without borders and spaces without walls.
I imagine communities
without borders eventually spreading out to become a world-wide
web of humanity and a glimpse of the Kingdom of God in the here
and now.
As a very
diverse community how do you gather together around the Christian
story?
Our community is made up of people from Christian faith traditions,
other faith traditions and those without any faith tradition
children, adults with and without learning disabilities and many
for whom English isn't their first language. For that reason when
we gather, as a community, its for times of very simple shared
prayer and story telling and lots of music and song.
LArche
Belfast is rooted in the Christian gospels, and is inspired by the
gifts of people with disabilities. That gives us our identity. We
tell the story of Christ as the foundation story of our community.
This is a story of love made human that called us into being and
gave us our mission. We are not saying that it is the only story
but it is the story that gives meaning to our lives in our community.
We hope that in the telling of our story we include those for whom
it's not their original story. There are many stories that give
meaning and purpose to peoples lives and we love hearing them
but the Christian Story is our story and we are happy to share it.
MARIA GARVEY
was interviewed by Anna Rankin on 23 March 2006.
|